The US national airspace is home to almost 10 billion birds, a very large number compared to the number of model aircraft which is estimated at a million or less. The Mercatus Center at George Mason University analyzed the data of bird collisions with full scale aircraft. The article then makes parallels to aeromodeling even taking into account that models have a much shorter flight life cycle due to battery limitations and the fact that models are far more grounded than birds. The research makes some strong conclusions about the unlikelihood of a sUAS strike with a full scale aircraft nullifying many of the exaggerated concerns.
6 comments
Comments are closed.
Trending
Tags
AC91-57C
airspace
alaska
AMAGOV
AOPA
AUVSI
bill
budget
CBO
clubs
Congress
dot
drone
drones
EAA
FAA
FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act
FAA Renewal
Facebook
FCC
FPV
FRIA
GPS flight
HR 658
LAANC
Law
legislation
Modernization and Reform Act
notam
NPRM
registration
regulation
regulations
remoteid
remote identification
rich hanson
rules
safety
safety and knowledge test
shutdown
standards
sUAS
TFRs
UAS
UAV
Categories
Archives
Tags
AC91-57C
airspace
alaska
AMAGOV
AOPA
AUVSI
bill
budget
CBO
clubs
Congress
dot
drone
drones
EAA
FAA
FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act
FAA Renewal
Facebook
FCC
FPV
FRIA
GPS flight
HR 658
LAANC
Law
legislation
Modernization and Reform Act
notam
NPRM
registration
regulation
regulations
remoteid
remote identification
rich hanson
rules
safety
safety and knowledge test
shutdown
standards
sUAS
TFRs
UAS
UAV
I think this posting of bird strikes with aircraft was very good it gives you another view of the facts some of these things you don’t think about .
This study uses an incomplete data set. Here’s link to military study showing a lot of data that they did not consider, including fatalities not considered:
https://www.livescience.com/43833-military-helicopters-bird-threat.html
AirSafe also has some information that appears that they did not consider:
https://www.airsafe.com/birds/top_ten.htm
WOW. Looks like the AMA is really picking at straws to save model aviation.
Never should have supported drones Mr Brown. We are paying the price now.
In embracing the MRs, which the public, media, and others generally categorize as “drones,” we lost the ability to draw a clear and bright line between our member operations and those now proving to be problematic.
How true. Unfortunately the public and our politicians are referring to all R/C flying aircraft as “Drones”. Instead of the AMA drawing a clear distinction between sUAS and model airplanes and embracing FPV, they decided to defend it and state that drone FPV operators must abide by the AMA safety code. WHAT A JOKE. These reckless people couldn’t care less about model aviation and OUR safety record. Now we have to deal with this because as of now, the government(FAA)and politicians are not interested in understanding the dramatic difference between model planes(including helicopters) and FPV operators. Hopefully this difference will be “discovered”, but for now we must deal with the consequences of Bob Brown’s decisions as well as other members of the so called AMA leadership.
I still seem to have trouble with the faa and the fdot making it an intrusion on
something that the congress and senate have already told them to stay away from in the resent past and would love to know who gave them the go ahead to do the intrusion in the first place , just wondering is all ?