“The Academy believes that the FAA must address and adjudicate the 33,000 plus comments to its interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft and resolve the issues and concerns presented before moving forward in finalizing the small UAS Rule.”
6 comments
Comments are closed.
What a load of political crap!
ron
The PDF file of the “AMA’s Comments to the sUAS NPRM – Docket No. FAA-2015-0150 (Final Version)” only goes to page 9. I would like to read all of it. Please fix. Tank you.
Robert – This document contains 9 pages, you may need to “page down” to see the additional pages.
https://www.modelaircraft.org/gov/AMA_sUASNPRM_Comments.pdf
I believe that comments by AMA are right on and congratulate their efforts and diligent work on this subject. Thank you AMA.
I believe response by AMA are right on and congratulate them on their tireless efforts to promote the safe operation of “Model Aircraft” and back the congressional review of 2012.
Thank you AMA.
Read with interest AMA’s comments to the sUAS NPRM.
I was disappointed that PART 61– CERTIFICATION, was not addressed. My own view is that “COMMERCIAL” needs only to precede CERTIFICATION to make sense. I believe all commercial operators should be licensed/regulated in the use of sUAS.
Not hobbiest or recreational AMA club members