{"id":4215,"date":"2020-02-28T17:05:25","date_gmt":"2020-02-28T21:05:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/?p=4215"},"modified":"2020-02-28T17:19:58","modified_gmt":"2020-02-28T21:19:58","slug":"ama-submits-official-comments-on-remote-id-proposal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/2020\/02\/28\/ama-submits-official-comments-on-remote-id-proposal\/","title":{"rendered":"AMA Submits Official Comments on Remote ID Proposal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3925 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/amablog-modelaircraft-org.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/04\/ama.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"128\" height=\"72\" \/>AMA has officially submitted its comments on the FAA&#8217;s Remote ID proposal, docket ID FAA-2019-1100. The official comment outlines AMA&#8217;s concerns with the proposal and gives attainable solutions. AMA understands and supports the overall goal of the NPRM, however, the proposed rule fails to take into account traditional model aircraft and hobbyists.<\/p>\n<p>The comment period closes on March 2, 2020 \u2013 please consider submitting a comment soon, before the deadline.\u00a0Information on how to submit a comment, as well as template comments that you may use as a guideline are both <a href=\"https:\/\/send.modelaircraft.org\/link.cfm?r=3W_ZOwSSZeZXAP__a19zfg~~&amp;pe=8ixdAspZ4ERSiN6tGkT6gcgCDdWzy7NlaUXeAHe6RgQmq2f5k5jw84-twtJNvilcAAqQmq3SWBoe_VE3eUyeFA~~&amp;t=s7DuQOu3jb2ouQj1224Ydw~~\">available here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/amablog-modelaircraft-org.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/02\/The-Academy-of-Model-Aeronautics-Dockett-FAA-2019-1100Final.pdf\"><strong>View AMA&#8217;s official comments.<\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AMA has officially submitted its comments on the FAA&#8217;s Remote ID proposal, docket ID FAA-2019-1100. The official comment outlines AMA&#8217;s concerns with the proposal and gives attainable solutions. AMA understands and supports the overall goal of the NPRM, however, the proposed rule fails to take into account traditional model aircraft [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1002439,"featured_media":3955,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wds_primary_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1002439"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4215"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4222,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4215\/revisions\/4222"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3955"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amablog.modelaircraft.org\/amagov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}